We Are Explaining the World

Researching has always been my favorite and what I miss the most of my activities! It then made me realized that knowledge is power. I am able to change and progress so much in so little time just by reading a lot.

A lot of people are commenting and complaining about who i am today in their mind. They think I've changed for many reasons. I would say that's better at least i check what i'm going to internalize in life.

But they say it is bad for your belief. Since when was confirming knowledge considered bad? While at the same time you go to school or uni to train your ability to check everything you knew.

I dont know how to make them understand what they've already done at uni is simply making them understand how to deal with types of information they face. But at some points, they reject to be the one who is master in facing information. It is contradiction.

What happens to their rational and logical state. Well i might be so rude, but what im talking is what the reality really is. Here is the thing, if you know that information can be myth, something made-up to make things logical. And information can be based on proof. Something well-explained and scientific.

Then someone complaining, who the heck has the authority to determine and say science is the only window that i could look through. My answer at least that's what we have the best in human civilization. This answer is so simple, it comes from the one who knows how the human civilization was.

We were stuck in uncheck information while we didnt have the tool to check it. Now thinkers and philoshopers have done a great job in creating the tool, and why dont we appreciate it?

What makes me annoyed is that, the one who never has the time to check everything they know, blame on me for what im today. Where i spent my time to do my own research about what i believe.

Someone whose idea is all about money, popularity and dating is complaining me, the one who doesnt really care about of which have already mentioned. Im writing in english (ignore my grammartical errors) in order to express my anger in a way where they know little about it. So i can be free.

I know postmodernism, i know i have to postpone to believe a paradigm otherwise i fall into the same hole as my commentators. To make it distinct and clear, i have the believe that's responsible to the reality. At least it is not delusional and it is based on fact which everyone could check themselves.

It is exactly different to the one who bases their knowledge to myth, i call something uncheck as a myth. It is indeed human understanding transition, mythos to logos, history told us. What else i want to state, i think it is about the conservativity of the people. The one who stick their life to an old story and doesnt have time to read and understand other stories.

They think they are free, how is it called 'free' when they live their life in dogma? They live with someone's thinking paradigm. Sadly, they call me as a person who was influenced badly by the west. Thing that they dont know that logic is our nature, eventhough we are dominated by emotions, it doesnt mean we dont have the logic at all.

It is totally okay if people like that do not force their believe to others, it becomes annoying if they do. I've ever been in a position where they are, but they teach me as if i've never been.

Here is the bigger picture. You were born in this world, know nothing about it and your parents gave you rules that have to be obeyed, you live years in that circle, you internalize it. Older you get, you know that there are many types of this lifestyle. This is the starting point where you have the choice to check what you've been taught by your parents or keep doing it without knowing this is truth or not.

Well im not talking about truth, i prefer to called it as checked information. Cause at the end of the day, none knows the truth since it is too complex to be measured. Why do we have to choose to check it? Because we have the ability to validate or confirm it. We have the brain to think and information to be processed.

Since we have the opportunity to be objective, why dont we choose that, it doesnt kill your ability as human being, to think. On the other hand, you are limited to think. Again, i dont wanna be the one who force something to be disgested, i only be the one who informs another choice. An optional choice that you could pick freely.

The more important, this side is dynamic, progressive, open to changes. You could change it as long as you have enough proof and firm argument. While the other side, you couldnt.

Anyways, the last i could say, i want this world a better place for everyone, without discrimination from 'something' that has never been checked before. Eventhough you dont wanna leave the unchecked informnation behind, it is okay. But to face this 'real' world, you have to be fair, not everyone is like you.

We are explaining the world, not providing explanation to the world.

08:40